Skip to main content
· 12/16/1977

Maurice P. Foley Co. v. Balderson

Citations

  • 186 U.S. App. D.C. 301
  • 569 F.2d 132

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • general rule not applied because “the certificate of deposit has attached to it a condition, that the amount deposited is payable on the return of the certificate: and the appellant is, in fact, resisting the recovery of the claim upon the ground that this condition is not complied with”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Customs, MacKinnon, Markey, Patent, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.