Maurice Keating, Jr. v. Federal Aviation Administration and Langhorne M. Bond, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an agency’s charge to grant exemptions “in the public interest” provided a standard that was sufficiently meaningful for judicial review
• holding that an agency’s charge to grant exemptions “in the public interest” provided a standard that was sufficiently meaningful for judicial review
• holding that “in the public interest” standard in statute “provide[d] law to be applied . . . sufficient to permit judicial review”
• judicial review where the statute allowed the head of the Federal Aviation Administration to grant exemptions to an agency regulation if “such action would be in the public interest” (quoting 49 U.S.C. § 1421(c))
• agency must make decision \in the public interest\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).