Maurice Abrams & Co. v. Union National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the examiner [was required] to obtain further details about the Roof arrest, which were contained in the arresting officer’s incident report”
• stating that “[t]he glaring weaknesses revealed in the background check system . . . are the function of distinct policy choices made by the FBI, not violations of specific legal standards,” and “such policy choices fall squarely within” the exception
• describing the SOPs as “rigid” and “highly structured” and explaining that Examiners are “governed by” the SOPs, which “mandate the standards for approval or denial of the firearm sale” and impose “modest requirements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).