Maureen Scott v. Wayne Keith Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that if the correct disposition of the supplemental claims is clear, considerations of economy favor retaining jurisdiction
• “Monopsony pricing... is analytically the same as monopoly or cartel pricing and [is] so treated by the law”
• Supreme Court precedent with “moth-eaten foundations” not expressly overruled must be followed by lower courts.
• “Weight is different from admissibility. An expert’s report might be admissible but so lacking in weight as not to block the granting of summary judgment for the other side.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).