Maureen Otto v. Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an untimely suit “cannot be revived by pointing to effects within the limitations period of unlawful acts that occurred earlier” (citations omitted)
• concluding the same for another statue that also uses the phrase “terms, conditions, or privileges of employment” (quotation omitted)
• rejecting a retaliation claim because the alleged wrongful act “amply manifested itself as a possible retaliation from the start”
• stating that continuing tort extends limitations because it \could not reasonably have been expected to be made the subject of a lawsuit when it first occurred because its character as a violation did not become clear until it was repeated during the limitations period\
• temporary designation as acting section head is not contemplated as adverse employment action affecting the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment
• motions panel's denial of motion for dismissal is law of the case and \binding\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).