Maureen Deal Phillip Deal, Parents, on Behalf of Zachary Deal v. Hamilton County Board of Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the district court took great care to “limit testimony to matters relevant to the 1999-2000 IEP
• explaining that in certain cases, “a district court is required to make findings of fact based on a preponderance of the evidence contained in the complete record”
• awarding reimbursement for 30 hours per week of one-on-one therapy conducted in the home to supplement school-based program
• finding predetermination where, inter alia, “the School System steadfastly refused even to discuss the possibility of providing an ABA program” with the parents, despite “impressive results”
• finding predetermination based on evidence that “the School System steadfastly refused even to discuss the possibility of providing an ABA program, even in the face of impressive results”
• finding predetermination based on evidence that “the School System steadfastly refused even to discuss the possibility of providing an ABA program, even in the face of impressive results”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).