Skip to main content
· 2/14/1995

Maupin v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.

Citations

  • 894 S.W.2d 688
  • 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 264
  • 1995 WL 57449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no tortious interference for the defendant’s failure to deal with the plaintiff after he had left his position of employment with the defendant
  • a contract is sufficiently definite if its terms can be defined with the aid of extrinsic evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, P.J., and Breckenridge and Spinden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.