Maupin v. Compton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where, as here, plaintiffs’ claims . . . arise from different circumstances and would require separate analyses, they are not logically related.”
• first quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 21; then quoting Greystone Cmty. Reinv. Ass’n v. Berean Capital, Inc., 638 F. Supp. 2d 278, 293 (D. Conn. 2009)
• “The convenience of counsel is not [an] appropriate consideration on a motion to transfer.”
• ECF No. 55 in D. Conn. 11-cv-0953

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).