Maunus v. Com., State Ethics Com'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the purpose of the Ethics Act is to ensure the “integrity and honesty of employees of this Commonwealth”
• reasoning that the purpose of the Ethics Act is to ensure the \integrity and honesty of employees of this Commonwealth\
• upholding provision of Ethics Act requiring financial disclosures of employees as constitutional because it applied to all employees, not only attorneys
• upholding provision of Ethics Act requiring financial disclosures of employees as constitutional because it applied to all employees, not only attorneys
• upholding legislative requirement of financial disclosures for executive branch attorneys, although conceding that such .a requirement would be unconstitutional if applied to members of the judiciary, who have their own ethical requirements
• Ethics Commission, not employer, Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, enforced sections of Ethics Act against employee attorneys

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).