Mauna Kea Power Co. v. Board of Land & Natural Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a reopened hearing to allow rebuttal of the ex parte communications cured any due process concerns that receipt of the communications presented
• intimating that due process would have been denied had the ex parte communications not been disclosed and the hearing reopened to allow the opposing party to respond to the contents of the ex parte communications
• waiving issue presented during secondary appeal that was not argued before administrative agency or on appeal to circuit court
• stating that where agencies consult sources outside the record, “the right of a party to cross-examine those sources and present (1) A change in conditions has resulted in the water allowed under the permit becoming inadequate for the permittee’s needs; or (2
• “Where an agency consults outside sources, the right of a party to cross-examine these sources and present rebuttal evidence is violated.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).