· 3/19/1920
Maull v. Lindsley
Citations
- 79 Fla. 361
- 84 So. 92
Syllabus
<p>Where the allegations of a bill of complaint do not make a case of confusion of boundaries cognizable in a court of equity, and it does not appear that the boundaries of the land in controversy are not capable of definite ascertainment by available evidence in a court of law where a jury trial is an organic right, a decree not predicated upon a distinct equity will be reversed:</p>
Judges: Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.