Maull v. Division of State Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that disciplinary measures undertaken by different supervisors are seldom comparable for purposes of Title VII analysis
• disregarding evidence of comparators who were disciplined by different decisionmak-ers because such evidence is “seldom sufficiently comparable to establish a prima facie case of discrimination for the simple reason that different supervisors may exercise their discretion differently”
• court could not conclude that other police officers were valid comparators where plaintiff could not show that these other officers’ circumstances, including disciplinary records, were comparable to plaintiffs
• “[T]he Eleventh Amendment does not bar the plaintiffs’ Rehabilitation Act claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).