Mauldin v. Peoples Bank of Indianola (In Re Mauldin)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to con- sider whether mandatory abstention provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(2) applied because there was no motion of record for mandatory absten- tion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).