Skip to main content
· 11/18/2013

Mauldin v. Holder

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 652
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 431
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3299
  • 571 U.S. 1030
  • 2013 WL 5566113
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the notice and claim forms, and the very modest monetary award that the average claimant would receive, were bound to discourage filings”
  • noting that a cy pres award is supposed to be limited to money that can’t feasibly be awarded to the intended beneficiaries
  • observing that the imposition of an unduly burdensome claims process typically stands to benefit defendants who can recover leftover funds
  • reasoning that “class counsel requested and were awarded excessive compensation” where “the attorneys’ fees represented … an outlandish 69%” of the aggregate value of the consumer class action settlement
  • explaining that \kicker\ clauses should face \a strong presumption of . . . invalidity\
  • suggesting that fees as high as one-half might be reasonable under certain circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.