· 11/18/2013
Mauldin v. Holder
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 652
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 431
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3299
- 571 U.S. 1030
- 2013 WL 5566113
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8210
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “the notice and claim forms, and the very modest monetary award that the average claimant would receive, were bound to discourage filings”
- noting that a cy pres award is supposed to be limited to money that can’t feasibly be awarded to the intended beneficiaries
- observing that the imposition of an unduly burdensome claims process typically stands to benefit defendants who can recover leftover funds
- reasoning that “class counsel requested and were awarded excessive compensation” where “the attorneys’ fees represented … an outlandish 69%” of the aggregate value of the consumer class action settlement
- explaining that \kicker\ clauses should face \a strong presumption of . . . invalidity\
- suggesting that fees as high as one-half might be reasonable under certain circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.