Mauder v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]n employee’s right to return to the same position after a qualified absence” falls under the FMLA interference provision
• “Because the issue is the right to an entitlement, the employee is due the benefit if the statutory requirements are satisfied, regardless of the intent of the employer.” (citations omitted)
• “Because the issue is the right to an entitlement, the employee is due the benefit if the statutory requirements are satisfied, regardless of the intent of the employer.” (cleaned up)
• To establish a prima facie case of retaliation under the FMLA, the plaintiff must demonstrate that (1) she was protected under the FMLA, (2) she suffered an adverse employment action, and (3
• applying Clark County Sch. Dist. to an FMLA claim
• addressing FMLA retaliation under burden-shifting framework

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).