Skip to main content
· 3/8/1985

Matusz v. Safeguard Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 489 A.2d 868
  • 340 Pa. Super. 116
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting as in pari materia the predecessor to the Guaranty Act and Pennsylvania’s now-repealed no-fault motor vehicle insurance act because both statutes address the victims of accidental injuries
  • PIGA “steps into the shoes of the insolvent insurer but only to the extent of their obligations on ‘covered claims . . .’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Beck, Tamilia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.