Maturi v. McLaughlin Research Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating 23 24 3 These circuit court cases were decided before the FCA retaliation provision was amended in 2009. “The pre-May 2009 version of § 3730(h
• “[W]here an employee's job duties involve investigating and reporting fraud, the employee's burden of proving he engaged in ‘protected conduct’ ... is heightened.”
• plaintiff must put “his superior on notice that FCA litigation was a distinct possibility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).