Oregon Supreme Court· 8/15/1901
Mattson v. Astoria
Citations
- 39 Or. 577
- 65 P. 1066
- 1901 Ore. LEXIS 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the legislature could immunize a city as long as the injured plaintiff had a remedy against a city employee
- recognizing that the legislature could immunize a city as long as the injured plaintiff had a remedy against a city employee
- recognizing that legislature could immunize cities consistently with Article I, section 10, as long as the injured plaintiff has a remedy against a city employee
- recognizing that the legislature could immunize a city as long as the injured plaintiff had a remedy against a city employee
- charter provision invalid where it immunized both the city and its officers, thereby denying plaintiff any remedy
- charter provision invalid where it immunized both the city and its officers, thereby denying plaintiff any remedy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bean
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-05-10· cited 156×
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1989-11-30· cited 125×
- Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 88×
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 82×
- Kyllo v. PanzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-08-16· cited 73×
- Oien v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-09-10· cited 53×
- Knowles v. United StatesSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-01-31· cited 49×
- Clarke v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityOregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-28· cited 46×
- Neher v. ChartierOregon Supreme Court· 1994-08-04· cited 46×
- Storm v. McClungOregon Supreme Court· 2002-06-07· cited 44×
- Matter of Certif. of Questions of LawSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-01-31· cited 43×
- Batdorff v. Oregon CityOregon Supreme Court· 1909-04-06· cited 42×
- Holden v. PIONEER BROADCASTING CO.Oregon Supreme Court· 1961-10-18· cited 39×
- Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-04-20· cited 33×
- Pullen v. EugeneOregon Supreme Court· 1915-03-02· cited 30×
- Colby v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1917-07-03· cited 29×
- Stewart v. Standard Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1936-03-09· cited 27×
- Morrell v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court· 1915-04-09· cited 24×
- Humphry v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court· 1916-02-08· cited 23×
- Mills v. ReynoldsWyoming Supreme Court· 1991-05-06· cited 21×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hover v. BarkhoofCommission of Appeals· 1870-12-28· cited 69×
- McClain v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1897-11-26· cited 40×
- Landis v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri· 1883-10-15· cited 29×
- Rankin v. BuckmanOregon Supreme Court· 1881-03-15· cited 24×
- Tearney v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court· 1877-09-15· cited 24×
- Butler v. AshworthCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-06-09· cited 7×
- Balls v. WoodwardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon· 1892-08-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.