Mattox v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If any portion of the request is inapt, incorrect, or not authorized by the evidence, denial of the request is proper.”
• even if a carrier owed a passenger a duty to exercise extraordinary care, it is not an absolute and unqualified insurer of the passenger’s safety
• a requested charge properly is refused if principle involved is substantially covered in charges given

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).