Mattox v. Bailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state correctional officer acted within scope of his official duties and thus was entitled to official immunity when officer allegedly beat inmate while escorting inmate across prison grounds
• holding state correctional officer acted within scope of his official duties and thus was entitled to immunity under GTCA when officer allegedly beat inmate while escorting inmate across prison grounds
• holding state correctional officer acted within scope of his official duties and thus was entitled to immunity under GTCA when officer allegedly beat inmate while escorting inmate across prison grounds
• holding state correctional officer acted within scope of his official duties and thus was entitled to immunity under GTCA when officer allegedly beat inmate while escorting inmate across prison grounds
• correctional officer who, while escorting a prisoner, slammed that prisoner’s head into a door and then beat him was entitled to immunity under the GTCA
• no action available against correctional officer who, while escorting a prisoner, slammed that prisoner’s head into a door and then beat him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).