Mattocks v. Daylin, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \(o)nly those claims clearly not covered by the policy are excluded from the duty to defend\
• “[o]nly those claims clearly not covered by the policy are excluded from the duty to defend”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kelmo Enterprises, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-06· cited 69×
• Unnamed case
  Seventh Circuit· 1981-07-21· cited 4×
• Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Reliance Insurance
  Seventh Circuit· 1981-07-21· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Mattocks v. Daylin, Inc.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-06-17· cited 17×