Mattison v. Johnston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the continued employment[ 7 ] of a terminable-at-will employee is sufficient consideration to support a restrictive covenant executed by the employee more than two years after commencement of employment”
• finding that the implied promise of employment and continued employment were sufficient consideration for the employee's agreement to a restrictive covenant
• finding continued 28 employment in an at-will relationship sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant
• where employment continued after signing of noncompetition agreement until employee left her job, implied promise of employment plus continued employment provided sufficient consideration for agreement
• although there is authority to contrary, most jurisdictions have found that continued employment is sufficient consideration to support restrictive covenant executed after at-will employment has begun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).