Court of Appeals of Arizona· 9/16/1986
Mattison v. Johnston
Citations
- 730 P.2d 286
- 152 Ariz. 109
- 1986 Ariz. App. LEXIS 642
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the continued employment[ 7 ] of a terminable-at-will employee is sufficient consideration to support a restrictive covenant executed by the employee more than two years after commencement of employment”
- finding that the implied promise of employment and continued employment were sufficient consideration for the employee's agreement to a restrictive covenant
- finding continued 28 employment in an at-will relationship sufficient consideration for a restrictive covenant
- where employment continued after signing of noncompetition agreement until employee left her job, implied promise of employment plus continued employment provided sufficient consideration for agreement
- although there is authority to contrary, most jurisdictions have found that continued employment is sufficient consideration to support restrictive covenant executed after at-will employment has begun
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eubank, Jacobson, Froeb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-12-03· cited 82×
- Demasse v. ITT Corp.Arizona Supreme Court· 1999-05-25· cited 63×
- Johnson v. ElsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-09-24· cited 60×
- Compass Bank v. HartleyD. Arizona· 2006-04-28· cited 31×
- Menendez v. Paddock Pool Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-12-10· cited 30×
- Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCD. Arizona· 2011-10-05· cited 29×
- Zellner v. Stephen D. Conrad, M.D., P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-11-09· cited 26×
- Central Monitoring Service, Inc. v. ZakinskiSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-09-04· cited 22×
- Riddle v. Arizona Oncology Services., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-03-08· cited 20×
- Camco, Inc. v. BakerNevada Supreme Court· 1997-04-24· cited 18×
- Chambers v. Valley National Bank of ArizonaD. Arizona· 1988-10-04· cited 18×
- Varsity Gold, Inc. v. PorzioCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-05-03· cited 11×
- Summits 7, Inc. v. KellySupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-08-19· cited 10×
- Magic Valley Truck Brokers, Inc. v. MeyerIdaho Court of Appeals· 1999-05-07· cited 9×
- Poole v. Incentives Unlimited, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 9×
- Nestle Food Co. v. MillerD. Rhode Island· 1993-08-25· cited 9×
- Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-11-06· cited 6×
- Demasse v. ITT Corp.D. Arizona· 1996-03-04· cited 6×
- Roger Demasse Maria A. Garcia Billy W. Jones Viola Munguia Greg Palmer Socorro Soza v. Itt Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Dba Itt CannonNinth Circuit· 1997-04-17· cited 5×
- Clogher v. Winston and StrawnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-01-31· cited 2×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court· 1984-02-08· cited 145×
- McRand, Inc. v. Van BeelenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-13· cited 107×
- George W. Kistler, Inc. v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-10-30· cited 77×
- Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. IngramTennessee Supreme Court· 1984-09-17· cited 69×
- Fairway Builders, Inc. v. Malouf Towers Rental Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-07-03· cited 64×
- Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. MascariCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-03· cited 53×
- Gary Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Sun Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-09-01· cited 53×
- Ranch Hand Foods, Inc. v. Polar Pak Foods, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1985-03-26· cited 46×
- Olliver/Pilcher Ins., Inc. v. DanielsArizona Supreme Court· 1986-02-20· cited 43×
- Smith, Batchelder & Rugg v. FosterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-20· cited 42×
- McCOMBS v. McClellandOregon Supreme Court· 1960-07-20· cited 31×
- Atkinson v. MarquartArizona Supreme Court· 1975-10-23· cited 29×
- Lessner Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. KidneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-12-30· cited 22×
- Simko, Inc. v. Graymar Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-09-09· cited 22×
- Hogan v. Bergen Brunswig CorporationNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-09-29· cited 20×
- Savard v. SelbyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-04-10· cited 19×
- Lassen v. BentonArizona Supreme Court· 1959-11-13· cited 18×
- Uvodich v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-04-10· cited 17×
- American Credit Bureau, Inc. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-12-23· cited 14×
- Research & Trading Corp. v. PowellCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1983-10-12· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.