Skip to main content
· 11/1/1976

Mattingly v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 429 U.S. 927
  • 97 S. Ct. 332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing for bipartite arbitration over \any difference or dispute arising out of the interpretation or application of any of the provisions contained in th[e] [a]greement\
  • providing for bipartite arbitration over “any difference or dispute arising out of the interpretation or application of any of the provisions contained in th[e] [a]greement”
  • “In … light of Alberici– Eby’s failure to move in a timely fashion to achieve multi- party arbitration (assuming that such was available), it would be manifestly unjust to deny the Laborers an oppor- tunity to be heard by way of bipartite arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.