· 1/4/1952
Mattingly v. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co.
Citations
- 12 F.R.D. 266
- 1952 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3551
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting joint attorney's argument that privileged communications from the joint representation may be withheld because the non-party joint clients have not consented to the disclosure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weinfeld
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.