Skip to main content
· 9/30/2003

Mattina v. Chinatown Carting Corp.

Citations

  • 290 F. Supp. 2d 386
  • 173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2660
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17255
  • 2003 WL 22251213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordering section 10(j) injunctive relief because “further delay adversely effects the financial situation of the discharged employees” and that the court “need find only that the public interest will not be adversely affected by the granting of the injunction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.