Skip to main content
· 6/30/1976

Mattie Hammond v. The Honorable Richard B. Adkisson, Pulaski County, Arkansas, Circuit Judge, and Monroe Love, Pulaski County, Arkansas, Sheriff

Citations

  • 536 F.2d 237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the trier of fact might well conclude ... that there was no likelihood that a [nineteen year old] young woman's words would provoke a violent response from the particular officer involved\
  • first amendment requires \determination that the words were used 'under such circumstances' that they were likely to arouse to immediate and violent anger the person to whom the words were addressed\ [emphasis omitted]
  • first amendment requires ‘‘determination that the words were used ‘under such circumstances’ that they were likely to arouse to imme- diate and violent anger the person to whom the words were addressed’’ [emphasis omitted]
  • first amendment requires ‘determination that the words were used “under such circumstances” that they were likely to arouse to immediate and violent anger the person to whom the words were addressed’ . . .
  • “Although the words used may be judicially noted as profane and abusive, a trier of fact might nonetheless find they did not constitute ‘fighting words’ — that is, words likely to incite the addressee to a violent reaction under the circumstances of the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Webster, Urbom

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.