Matticks v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the employer waived issues by failing to raise them in its appeal to the WCAB, noting that “[t]he fact that Employer may have argued the issues in its brief to the [WCAB] is unavailing”
• reversing Board to the extent it addressed issues employer briefed, 7 but did not set forth in its appeal, holding such issues were waived
• ‘[the e]mployer effectively waived its 6 arguments [by not raising them in the appeal documents and t]he fact that [the e]mployer may have argued the issues in its brief to the Board is unavailing as it failed to comply with [Section] 111.11(a
• “[The [e]mployer effectively waived its arguments [by not raising them in the appeal documents and t]he fact that [the e]mployer may have argued the issues in its brief to the Board is unavailing as it failed to comply with 34 Pa. Code § 111.11(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).