Mattice v. Goodman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s employment of employees who, in accordance with their job descriptions, customarily assisted elderly persons through a revolving door did not create a duty on the defendant’s part to assist elderly people through the door
• where building owners owed no legal duty to assist elderly person through door, no such duty was created by building owner’s employment of an employee who, in accordance with his job description, customarily assisted elderly persons through the door
• where building owners owed no legal duty to assist elderly person through door, no such duty was created by building owner’s employment of employee who, in accordance with his job description, customarily assisted elderly persons through door
• where building owners owed no legal duty to assist elderly person through door, no such duty was created by building owner’s employment of an employee who, in accordance with his job description, customarily assisted elderly persons through the door
• where building owners owed no legal duty to assist elderly person through door, no such duty was created by building owner's employment of an employee who, in accordance with his job description, customarily assisted elderly persons through the door
• where building owners owed no legal duty to assist elderly person through door, no such duty was created by building owner’s employment of employee - 13 - who, in accordance with his job description, customarily assisted elderly persons through door

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).