Skip to main content
· 1/13/2014

Matthews v. Washington

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 914
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 793
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3405
  • 571 U.S. 1135
  • 2014 WL 102577
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the plaintiff received due process notwithstanding that he could not call and question the patients whose statements were part of the record and resulted in the cases before the DAB
  • cross-examination not necessary where board did not rely on subjective feelings of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.