Skip to main content

Matthews v. State

Citations

  • 148 N.E.2d 334
  • 237 Ind. 677
  • 1958 Ind. LEXIS 194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that provisions of a state law against carrying of a pistol without a license \do not restrict nor prohibit appellant or any other person from having a pistol in his home or 'fixed place of business' for the defense of himself...\
  • holding that provisions of a state law against carrying of a pistol without a license \do not restrict nor prohibit appellant or any other person from having a pistol in his home or `fixed place of business' for the defense of himself. . .\
  • analyzing the Firearms Act and its purpose “to achieve a maximum degree of control over criminal and careless uses of certain types of firearms” (emphasis added)
  • statute requires procurement of a license to carry certain firearms except in person’s abode or fixed place of business
  • “The Legislature has the power, in the interest of public safety and welfare, to provide reasonable regulations for the use of firearms which may be readily concealed, such as pistols.”
  • right to bear arms subject to reasonable exercise of police power

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bobbitt, Emmert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.