Skip to main content
· 1/12/1984

Matthews v. Scully

Citations

  • 579 F. Supp. 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • taking notice of challenged TDF fact sheets, “Target Date 5 Retirement Funds—Tips for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries” document, U.S. Government Accountability 6 Report, and Morningstar publication
  • “generalized statements about working together do 5 not demonstrate joint action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.