Matthews v. SBA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Connecticut’s “general long arm jurisdiction provision, § 52-59b, rather than [Connecticut’s] corporation specific long arm provision, § 33-929, applies to foreign LLCs”
• “[O]ur general long arm jurisdiction provision, § 52-59b, rather than our corporate specific long arm provision, § 33-929, applies to foreign LLCs.”
• “we are convinced that our general long arm jurisdiction statute, § 52–59b, applies to foreign LLCs”
• “[W]e are convinced that our general long arm jurisdiction statute, § 52–59b, applies to foreign LLCs.”
• “The plaintiffs’ claim is twofold: first, the court has jurisdiction over these defendants under the applicable long arm statutes….”
• “[W]e are convinced that our general long arm jurisdiction statute, § 52–59b, applies to foreign LLCs.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).