Matthews v. Matthews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court abused its discretion when it found that the husband was financially able to pay the wife’s attorney fees, while at the same time allowed the husband to bring the appeal as a poor person

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Marriage of Brophy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-06-26· cited 56×
• In re Marriage of Patel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-06-28· cited 56×
• Marriage of Blaisdell v. Blaisdell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-04-29· cited 38×
• In Re Marriage of Hilkovitch
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-05-24· cited 33×
• Carvallo v. Carvallo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-07-06· cited 18×
• Dull v. Dull
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-13· cited 17×
• Swanson v. Swanson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-08-31· cited 16×
• Gilmore v. Gilmore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-19· cited 14×
• Canham v. Saisi
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-10-27· cited 10×
• Tilmon v. Tilmon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-02· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1964-04-09· cited 40×
• Sandberg v. Sandberg
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-04-27· cited 26×
• Hursh v. Hursh
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-03-04· cited 23×
• Hall v. Hall
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-01-09· cited 17×
• Kuhns v. Kuhns
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-08-31· cited 17×
• Neeland v. Neeland
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-03-11· cited 12×