Skip to main content

Matthews v. Matthews

Citations

  • 133 So. 2d 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the causes of action were not identical where the earlier action required a greater standard of proof than the subsequent action
  • holding trial court erred by basing its judgment on records from a prior case between the same parties where records were not judicially noticed or made part of the record in case before it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sebring

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.