Skip to main content
· 11/26/1986

Matthews v. DeSoto

Citations

  • 721 S.W.2d 286
  • 30 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 85
  • 1986 Tex. LEXIS 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that prejudgment interest is intended to compensate a plaintiff for being denied the opportunity to invest and earn interest on the amount of damages
  • ten percent per annum, compounded daily

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.