Skip to main content
· 10/7/1998

Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.

Citations

  • 351 Md. 544
  • 719 A.2d 119
  • 1998 Md. LEXIS 807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that “judgment absolutely void for want of jurisdiction appearing on its face[ ] may be set aside on the motion of any person who, although not a party to the action, has an interest in the property upon which it is a cloud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.