Matthew v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it would be inequitable to award prejudgment interest where the plaintiff “prevented [the defendant] from determining the amount of its potential liability” by delaying the production of relevant financial information
• holding-that contractual statute of limitations never began to run because the disability had not yet terminated
• relief pursuant to Rule 59(e) is appropriate, if, inter alia;, the court fails to consider an important factor, or the court gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).