MATTHEW STEVEN REECE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing as the holding in Testan \that Back Pay Act relief is available only to compensate for a reduction in pay or a decrease in grade\
• finding that in the BPA’s text, there is “no hint of an exclusion of, or exemption for, federal sector Title VII adjudications”
• recognizing as the holding in Testan “that Back Pay Act relief is available only to compensate for a reduction in pay or a decrease in grade”
• explaining that Back Pay Act requirements “must be satisfied” for waiver to apply
• holding the BPA waives sovereign immunity from interest on Title VII claims
• finding the BPA and Title VII to be complementary in back pay action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).