Matthew Stephens v. Tech International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “ ‘[a] frivolous infringement suit is one in which the patentee knew or, on reasonable investigation, should have known was baseless’ ”
• “[T]he pertinent inquiry is whether Spectrum knew or should have known that it could not successfully assert the ’647 patent against Tech but pursued its infringement claim anyway.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).