Skip to main content
· 7/24/1991

Matthew Mahoney v. Ernest Vondergritt, Etc.

Citations

  • 938 F.2d 1490
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 15968
  • 1991 WL 134511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a full hearing \would have been premature\ where \the judge was faced only with impressionistic concerns about improprieties\
  • upholding trial judge’s decision not to go beyond a preliminary inquiry, held without counsel present, into post-verdict allegations that jurors did not confine their deliberations to evidence presented at trial
  • upholding Rule 4 summary 2 dismissal of § 2254 petition
  • upholding Rule 4 summary dismissal of § 2254 petition
  • upholding Rule 4 summary dismissal of § 2254 petition
  • upholding Rule 4 summary dismissal of § 2254 petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Coffin, Torruella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.