MATTHEW LAUDIEN v. TANIA RIVERA - LAUDIEN

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not err in using out-of-court statements that had sufficient indicia of reliability to enhance defendant’s offense level
• deciding that a 911 call from the victim and the victim’s statement and grand jury testimony were sufficiently reliable “for use in sentencing,” and noting photographic evidence corroborated those statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).