Matthew Lanier Beverly v. Warden Mr. Charlie Jones and the Attorney General of the State of Alabama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that habeas petitioner’s statute-of-limitations argument was “beyond [the court’s] consideration” because “a state’s interpretation of its own laws provides no basis for federal habeas relief since no question of a constitutional nature is involved”
• finding a habeas challenge based on a state statute of limitations “beyond our consideration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).