MATTHEW JON BOBOT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that parenthetical served “a defining function”
• “[I]t is improper for the court to rewrite the terms of a contract, or draw a new contract for the parties, when the terms thereof are clear and unambiguous, simply to avoid hardships.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).