Skip to main content
· 3/5/2013

Matthew Hale v. United States

Citations

  • 710 F.3d 711
  • 2013 WL 819379
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 4650

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a claim that was not raised in the trial court or on direct appeal was “doubly defaulted” on collateral review
  • holding that a claim that was not raised in the trial court or on direct appeal was “doubly defaulted” on collateral review
  • holding that a claim that was not raised in the trial court or on direct appeal was “doubly defaulted” on collateral review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Posner, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.