Matthew Gunner v. Robert Welch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that the result would have been the same “even before the holding in Martinez ”
• suggesting that the result would have been the same “even before the holding in Martinez”
• noting that the petitioner argued in his Rule 26(B) application that appellate counsel had been ineffective for failing to advise him on the time limit for state post-conviction relief
• dealing specifically with the preservation of an ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim
• discussing the duties of an agent and finding that an appellate attorney had a duty to inform his client of the existence of and deadlines for collateral review where the timing was “integrally related to the filing of the transcript on direct appeal”
• a federal habeas petitioner must show cause why he failed to file a state postconviction petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).