Skip to main content
· 6/28/2006

Matthew E. Levine v. United States

Citations

  • 453 F.3d 1348
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16176
  • 2006 WL 1751784

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Review of the Board’s judgment may be made on the administrative record when supplementation is not required for meaningful judicial review.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Archer, Gajarsa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.