Matthew Bonnstetter v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a similar attempt to hold the City liable for purport: ed hiring-plan violations, explaining that such a “theory does not constitute a genuine claim under Shakman”
• no acquiescence to claim splitting where claim preclusion raised as defense \in all motions filed in the district court\
• dismissal with prejudice constitutes a final judgment
• dismissal with prejudice constitutes a final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).