Skip to main content
· 1/30/2013

Matthew Banks Ashworth v. Kathryn (Ashworth) Ehrgott

Citations

  • 982 N.E.2d 366
  • 2013 WL 353085
  • 2013 Ind. App. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that father waived his challenge to trial court’s decision to use Comment 2(b)’s percentage methodology by failing to raise issue below but noting that he essentially challenged the ratio, not the methodology itself
  • “Judges and practitioners should be innovative in finding ways to include income that would have benefited the family had it remained intact, but be receptive to deviations where reasons justify them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Barnes, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.