Matter of Washington v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s assertion that he wanted to consult a lawyer about making a deal in exchange for information about his suppliers not an invocation of his right to counsel
• defendant’s assertion during interrogation “that he wanted to consult with a lawyer about the possibility of making a ‘deal’ in exchange for divulging information about his suppliers” was not an invocation of right to counsel concerning questions on other matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).