Matter of Warren v. Dickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cleaner’s refusal to work without gloves—a protective equipment requirement established by administrative rule—was actionable pursuant to the anti-retaliation provisions
• cleaner’s refusal to work without gloves—a protective equipment requirement established by administrative rule—was actionable pursuant to the anti-retaliation provisions
• “[A]lthough ORS 433.010(1) provides that ‘[n]o person shall willfully cause the spread of any communicable disease within this state[,]’ plaintiff did not allege any such willful action here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).